In his own emphatic language, ” he couldn’t bear the enclosing of Welcombe,” and the one authoritative fragment of his dialog preserved to us thus brings vividly out probably the greatest recognized and most distinctive options of his personal character and history his deep and life-long attachment to his native place. We now have a notice, dated September 1, 1615, to the effect that Mr Shakespeare had on that day instructed the agent of the company “that he was not able to bear the enclosing of Welcombe.” As his proprietary rights and pecuniary pursuits have been to not be affected by the professional- posed enclosure, this sturdy expression of feeling must check with the public advantages of the Welcombe frequent fields, and particularly to what in Scotland would be called their ” amenity,” the aspect of worth arising from their freedom and beauty, their local historical past and associations. There may be evidently on Shakespeare’s part a robust feeling against the proposed enclosure, and the agents of the scheme had clearly completed their finest to remove his objections, promising amongst different things that if it went forward he should endure no pecuniary loss, a professional- mise already confirmed by a legal instrument.

Petite Latina beauty joined by BF in time to record a sex ... Under date November seventeenth Greene says, in notes which still exist, “My cosen Shakespear comyng yesterdy to town, I went to see him how he did. He informed me that they assured him they ment to inclose no further than to Gospell Bush, and so upp straight (leavyng out part of the Dyngles to the ffield) to the gate in Clopton hedg, and take in Salis- buryes peece ; and that they mean in Aprill to survey the land, after which to gyve satisfaction, and never earlier than ; and he and Mr Hall say they suppose ther can be nothyng completed in any respect.” This proves that the brokers of the scheme had seen Shakespeare on the subject, that he had gone care- totally into the main points of their plan, consulted his son-in- legislation Dr John Hall about them, and arrived at the conclu- sion that for the current they need take no decided action within the matter. To all lovers of literature, to all whose spirits have been touched to finer points by its regenerating influence, these spots, and above all of the abbey grave and the chancel tomb, are holy ground, national shrines visited by pilgrims from every land, who breathe with delight and gratitude and affection the household names of Shakespeare and of Scott.

The title Shakespeare is found in the Midland counties two centuries earlier than the delivery of the poet, scattered so extensively that it isn’t simple at first sight to fix the locality of its rise or hint the strains of its progress. Hence, of all nice authors, they are the two most habitually considered in connexion with their native haunts and homesteads. The family of Arden thus represented the union, under considerably uncommon situations of original distinction and equality, of the two great race elements which have gone to the making of the typical modern Englishman. A really needless and abortive attempt has been made to call in query Robert Arden’s social and family place on the bottom that in a contemporary deed he known as a husbandman (agricola), the assumption being that a husbandman is just a farm-labourer. The very fact of his being spoken of in official documents as a husbandman doesn’t due to this fact within the least affect Robert Arden’s social place, or his relation to the good house of Arden, which is now established on the clearest proof. From the provisions of her father’s will it is obvious that of his seven daughters she was his favour- ite; and the links of evidence are now full connecting her father Robert Arden with the great Warwickshire household of Arden, whose members had more than once stuffed the posts of excessive-sheriff and lord-lieutenant of the county.

Among the members of the guild the poet’s ancestors are to be looked for, and it isn’t improbable, as Mr French suggests, that John and Joan Shakespeare, entered on the Knoll register in 1527, may have been the mother and father of Richard Shakespeare of Snitterfield, whose sons gave each to his children the favourite household names. Richard Shakespeare, the poet’s grand father, occupied a considerable dwelling and culti- vated a forest farm at Snitterfield, between three and four miles from Stratford. The poet’s father was evidently a man of power, ambition, and public spirit, with the information and means requisite for pushing his fortune with fair success in his new career. But nine months later, when the native proprietors seemed bent on pushing the scheme, Shakespeare takes a extra determined stand, and pronounces strongly in opposition to the entire enterprise. It relates to a proposal made in 1614 by among the native proprietors for the enclosure of sure common lands at Welcombe and Old Stratford.